“All traffic infringements are in direct contradiction to section 92 of our Commonwealth Constitution which ensures the free use of Commonwealth Roads.” This is simply not true as section 92 is only about crossing State borders and no more regarding customs duties. The operative word is among.
“An Act to Constitute the Commonwealth of Australia 1900 (UK) 63 & 64 Victoria Ch 12. “Section 92. On the imposition of uniform duties of customs, trade, commerce, and intercourse among the States, whether by means of internal carriage or ocean navigation, shall be absolutely free.”
Synonyms of among: in the middle of; between; amid, betwixt;
In short, yes – but technically you are traveling not driving (see below). However, just because you have a right to do something (in this case the right to travel), it does not mean you’ll never be hassled, intimidated, charged or even temporarily thrown in prison. Rights must be constantly asserted and defended, especially in the face of a growing police state such as the one in which we are now living. That means you need to be prepared to defend yourself. It’s not for everyone, but such a price is paid by those who defend liberty and know how to drive without a license successfully. Knowledge is our most powerful weapon when you learn how to use it!
Traveling without a license depends on how well you know and assert your rights.
This might appear to be semantics or splitting hairs, but it’s not. The whole issue of how to drive without a license boils down to this. In everyday common English, to travel by means of a car, and to drive, are identical. However, one of the biggest cons of the Law Society is the fact that they have their own language (legalese) which appears to be English but which has different definitions for some key terms. In this case, as defined by legalese, “to drive” is to go on the roads by a motorized conveyance doing business or being engaged in commerce, and it is a privilege. “To travel”, on the other hand, is a right, and no legislation can be passed to strip you of your fundamental, inherent rights.
To state you are “driving” is to unwittingly place yourself in admiralty or commercial jurisdiction.
As a sovereign being, you never need surrender your rights and exchange them for privileges. This is the way societies descend into tyranny. To exchange a right for a privilege is to ask permission for something (in the form of a governmental permit or license) that you are free to do anyway.
Driving is a privilege; traveling is a right. A privilege is granted by some authority, and equally it can be taken away by some authority. A right can never be abrogated. Our right to travel can never be stripped from us; it is as fundamental to our existence as our right to breathe.
There is a lot of case law supporting the right to travel. The quotes below are just a tiny fraction of it. However, it is almost all law cases from admiralty or commercial jurisdiction, so it is not entirely relevant here.
Judges have been ruling on this case for literally over 100 years in various levels of Courts. Retired policeman Jack McLamb wrote a great article citing some of the case law (below). (Please note however this is merely supporting evidence and not the final say, because of these cases were held in admiralty / maritime / commercial jurisdiction, and the secret to driving without a license is challenging this jurisdiction and having your case heard in a common law court.)
CASE #1: “The use of the highway for the purpose of travel and transportation is not a mere privilege, but a common fundamental right of which the public and individuals cannot rightfully be deprived.” Chicago Motor Coach v. Chicago, 169 NE 221.
CASE #2: “The right of the citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, either by carriage or by automobile, is not a mere privilege which a city may prohibit or permit at will, but a common law right which he has under the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.” Thompson v. Smith, 154 SE 579.
CASE #3: “The right to travel is a part of the liberty of which the citizen cannot be deprived without due process of law under the Fifth Amendment.” Kent v. Dulles, 357 US 116, 125.
CASE #4: “The right to travel is a well-established common right that does not owe its existence to the federal government. It is recognized by the courts as a natural right.” Schactman v. Dulles 96 App DC 287, 225 F2d 938, at 941.
For further information including case law on how to drive without a license, I suggest reading the magnificent sovereignty guide by Johnny Liberty “The Global Sovereign’s Handbook” and watching this in-depth InfoWars video. The DVD I Don’t Drive, I Travel is also very useful, inspiring and features people who know from firsthand experience about how to drive without a license successfully.
The best way to handle peace officers, law enforcements officers or policemen is as sovereign, freeman-on-the-land Dean Clifford does in the video above. Politely and courteously state your rights; know the law and quote cases if need be; display the confidence that you know how to drive without a license, and that it is perfectly lawful; refuse to be intimidated; and most of all, be prepared to have a long conversation with the initial person’s superiors. Most cops are completely unaware that they are enforcing commercial statutes in admiralty jurisdiction, and that you can exercise your right to remain in common law jurisdiction. Admiralty jurisdictions uses administrative rules, regulations, code, statutes, policy and bylaws – all of which are not real “law” but operate under the color of law. If you are traveling privately and not engaged in business on the roads, you are not under commercial jurisdiction and do not need a license.
You’d be surprised how many police officers know about the right to travel, and will honor it if you confidently assert your rights.
This compilation “How to Refuse Unconstitutional Checkpoints” features some great firsthand examples. Ask the law enforcement officer if they are detaining you (“Are you detaining me or am I free to go?”); if they say they are detaining you, state that they only have 2 legal reasons for doing so: your consent or reasonable suspicion based on probable cause. State that they do not have your consent, so therefore they must produce probable cause, else they are illegally detaining you. Ask them for evidence of probable cause; if they have none, ask them again, politely but repeatedly, if you are free to go.
If you have more questions about how to drive without a license, and others matters relating to freedom, you can call Tools For Freedom at 800-770-8802 x1, leave your name and number, and we’ll be happy to send you out a free print catalog full of freedom and sovereignty resources.
Want to keep informed on the latest and greatest news and analysis on the New World Order, Natural Health, Sovereignty and more? Sign up for free blog updates!
Makia Freeman is the editor of The Freedom Articles and senior researcher at ToolsForFreedom.com, writing on many aspects of truth and freedom, from exposing aspects of the global conspiracy to suggesting solutions for how humanity can create a new system of peace and abundance.
Irene Gravenhorst - No Drivers License or Insurance - Case Dismissed! (2009)
From: Irene-Maus: Gravenhorst(TM)
I confirm our tremendous success in the courts of Richmond on March 10, 2009 for a traffic ticket!
Never been to Provincial traffic court where they get the slaves to pay for their union dues ... with traffic violations/contracts. The hearing went as follows:
Paul Gibson, the charging constable was not in court.
The Judge called out my name and I approached the microphone and said "I claim Common law jurisdiction"
Whereupon, pursuant to 8 witnesses, she (the judge) fumbled with her papers and said, "Well.... we won't go there, you have been charged with failure to drive with a license and insurance".
Two other police officers in court started to snicker and whisper towards each other and when she said, "how do you plead, guilty or innocent?"
I looked at her and said in a calm voice, "I do not consent and I waive the benefits."
She then yelled "Case dismissed!" She did not look up and continued to fumble with the papers in front of her.
No reasons for this dismissal was submitted for the record.
Then as we were discussing this procedure in the lobby of the court house, Constable Paul Gibson walked in. I went up to him to say 'hello'.
He looked at me and said, "... and who might you be?"
After I told him and informed him that the case was dismissed, he said, "That's too bad".
Ladies and gentlemen, I was set up. They purposely kept Paul from the Courtroom to make it appear that its business as usual, it was packed that day.
There was a man just before my name was called that pleaded "not guilty" to charges that were trumped to over $1K but I did not fall for the trap.
When you do not enter a plea and state that; You do not consent = you do not consent to contract, you do not consent to their jurisdiction, you do not consent to them making legal determinations against you, you do not consent to perjurise yourself.
When You waive the benefits = you waive the benefits of the contracts to all parties concerned, the contract value is balanced to zero, zip, nada, its over!
I had placed a huge lien for unpaid contracts against him and the Delta police force. He was visibly shaking as he held his traffic contracts to shake my hand which was an agreement to contract for the $3B that I placed on a lien naming him as the Debtor to a large secured contract. Its not about a fight, its about waking them up ... that's all and yes, its a jurisdiction and breach of contract issue.
Prior to the court appearance Kapilanoq placed an Eviction Notice on the front door of the Richmond Courthouse. Afterwards, we went to Revenue Canada's office at Pender in Vancouver to tape a Permanent Eviction Notice on their building. Hopefully we can get our video on the net as soon as we meet with Daryl.
Kiapilanoq is my hero and he is supported by his business colleague and close friend, Mohawk Hereditary Red Jacket of Turtle Island.
Feel free to pass this on but please do not alter the content of this information as it is meant to educate and inform in the name of Truth.
Insofar as the bank legislated by the Squamish Government, its moving along (at a snail's pace) and we hope to have it up and running real soon so that we can issue the debit cards to pre-approved members.
United in Truth we remain free,
President and Director for USSBCG(TM)
See other documents here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/5127
See Irenes website here: http://www.loveforlife.com.au/node/4186